CPU only 4%-10% during render turntable
#1
Posted 08 June 2010 - 03:36 AM
Does this make sense ???
I have a Quad core Athlon.
HP Pavillion
8GB RAM
GeForce 9100 Integrated Graphics
Windows 64bit.
64 bit 3DCoat
Rendering 360 frames in sequence.
System feels really sluggish during render even though task
mgr reports low CPU utilization.
Could be a memory/bus bottleneck or something ???
Need some hints on what to expect.
Got a 15 Million voxel sculpture rendering.
#2
Posted 08 June 2010 - 03:41 AM
Also ... using DirectX version of Simple 3DCoat.
Cuda complained about old Nvidia drivers and I was not able to updated
those drivers yet.
#3
Posted 08 June 2010 - 06:51 AM
CPU only 4%-10% during render turntable
Does this make sense ???
I have a Quad core Athlon.
HP Pavillion
8GB RAM
GeForce 9100 Integrated Graphics
Windows 64bit.
64 bit 3DCoat
Rendering 360 frames in sequence.
System feels really sluggish during render even though task
mgr reports low CPU utilization.
Could be a memory/bus bottleneck or something ???
Need some hints on what to expect.
Got a 15 Million voxel sculpture rendering.
3DC renders using GPUs, not CPU.
#4
Posted 08 June 2010 - 07:36 AM
Exactly.3DC renders using GPUs, not CPU.
My YouTube channel ----> http://www.youtube.c...raphicGladiator
My sculpting experiments on 3D Coat.com ----> Wanna see...
My official website ----> www.grafikbuero-werner.de
(My website is in german language, but I work for the international market too. Just drop a mail, if you are interested.)
German speaking CG Workshops ----> www.lernfaktor.de
#5
Posted 08 June 2010 - 02:27 PM
My GPU is pretty lame, maybe.
#6
Posted 08 June 2010 - 02:49 PM
I'm thinking in terms of powersupply. UGH. I bet it does need new power supply.
Hope I can make that happen. I'm not much of a hardware guy.
#7
Posted 08 June 2010 - 06:11 PM
How do I tally up whether my PC can handle addition of dedicated GPU on card, or not ???
I'm thinking in terms of powersupply. UGH. I bet it does need new power supply.
Hope I can make that happen. I'm not much of a hardware guy.
As a rule of thumb for recently discussed CUDA cards (Nvidea): min 550W for GTX 470 and min 600W for GTX 480. These are power hungry and fewer GPUs would require less.
#8
Posted 08 June 2010 - 08:23 PM
I hope that's enough. The GeForce 8500GT supposedly consumes
about 180W according to some tests and reports. Ad one of it's
requirements waws listed as 300 W PSU or 350 PSU if newer machine.
But that was prob written a while ago.
Like I said ... I hope 500 W is a big nough jump, even if I decide to
try a better card in future.
At least I off the integrated chip. Not seeing a HUGE Boost even though on card and
with CUDA now. But I trust I haver done the right thing regardless.
Hopefully some new sculptures to show soon.
#9
Posted 16 June 2010 - 07:07 PM
http://www.newegg.co...0-138-_-Product
You would probably see a big improvement even with this card over your old one since it has 96 cores- no it's not going to be a GTX 275 and up type of improvement, but you probably will not need to cut your case to fit it, buy a new power supply, or add system fans to your case AND you'll save a huge amount of money to boot.
I'm looking into these cards as an option since I don't need to sculpt a bagillion voxels etc.- just 2-3 million and I'd be fine.
-g
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













