Jump to content


Photo

cuda + kepler


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 robotbob

robotbob

    Neophyte

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 85 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:09 AM

a friend showed me this today and i thought some here might like to see what the new kepler cards might get up too, especially with cuda.

http://extrahardware...hell-kepler.png
mac 10.6.6 | 2 x 2.26 GHz quad core Xeon | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | http://www.bitstate.com/

#2 robotbob

robotbob

    Neophyte

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 85 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 February 2012 - 11:55 AM

i am hoping these numbers actually happen but cuda definitely rocks.
mac 10.6.6 | 2 x 2.26 GHz quad core Xeon | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | http://www.bitstate.com/

#3 chingchong

chingchong

    Novice

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 390 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 14 February 2012 - 08:28 PM

http://www.tomshardw...ries,14642.html

Yeah...this is all the more reason for Andrew to re-compile CUDA for 3D Coat to bring it up to date, and hopefully get it much more involved in the application. I have been using the app for over 3yrs now and I still don't know to what extent it is incorporated in the voxel workflow (only really large brush sizes, using Masks?). I think this is one reason why NVidia isn't as gung-ho about it as they are with Mari. It has a very limited role. Get it involved in the Paint Room. The multi-threading there is so silky smooth up to a point (really large brush sizes, some brush types are much slower than others, and large texture sizes...8k maps+). Handing that task over to the GPU with CUDA when the pixels per brush stroke ratio reaches an arbitrary level, could make 3D Coat really shine as a texture painting application.


i think every user with a nvidia card out there (like me ), will appreciate when they can actually enjoy the CUDA-boost. :) :)

#4 robotbob

robotbob

    Neophyte

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 85 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:52 PM

the thing i really like about the potential of cuda is a much cheaper upgrade cycle for my hardware.
i can upgrade my video card instead of my CPU to get a much faster machine - for the software that uses cuda.
that can be much much cheaper overall. that and the recent awful flickering ATI drivers make nvida a better choice anyway.
adobe has embraced cuda and i use their products every single day and thats why i am mostly interested in this.
still a while to wait - april / may so i guess we will know if these numbers are real as its not official.
mac 10.6.6 | 2 x 2.26 GHz quad core Xeon | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | http://www.bitstate.com/




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users